Latento工作坊｜第二天 “隐谕：潜在的当代时刻”时程表
Event Details
时长：20分钟
主题：一起聆听（1）摘要：我想建议一种“一起聆听”的时刻——对声音难以捉摸的物质性的共同体验与反思。我对“聆听”的政治性也很感兴趣。希望你们可以带来任何你们喜欢或觉得重要的声音——可以是音乐也可以是取证音频。我也会带来一些材料，期待去聆听那些未知或者不可知的。
嘉宾：Prasad Shetty
时长：15分钟
主题：来自孟买的田野笔记（1）
摘要：这次演讲将以阅读的形式呈现一些在我孟买田野笔记中的短篇故事和图像。这些故事涉及到不同的人——天鹅绒机装配工，小承包商，卡车老板，建筑工人，寡妇，和前黑手党老大。在许多方面，它们都有细微差别，并重组了对权利、资本流动、官僚政治、财产，城市形态和基础设施的理解。
嘉宾：Rakhee Balaram
时长：20分钟
主题：超速度进化回归：昆虫、幽灵、流氓／旁观者（1）
摘要：Rakhee将在工作坊中逐一介绍昆虫，幽灵，流氓／旁观者这三位主角，并在科学、哲学与历史的学科基础之上，思考他们在自然界、艺术以及社会科学中所扮演的角色。她的兴趣在于昆虫拟态，幽灵形象（在本次工作坊中，会以不同形态反复出现）以及流氓／旁观者。这三种形象将被置于当代的立场中来进行考量。以上内容将被分为三个部分在工作坊当中展开：
第一部分：讲座/谈话介绍：谈论如何在当代视域内理解这三个主角及其与我们自身主体位置的关系。
第二部分：邀请工作坊参与者共同生产一出三幕剧：参与者从三个主角中选出其一：“昆虫”，“幽灵”，“流氓／旁观者”，并发起一场三幕剧形式的对话（可以用任何语言）。产生的对话将在第三部分的演出中作为衍生练习来阅读，并作为一种对（实际或虚拟的）栖居空间位置以及我们身体形态适应方式的评论。这将成为一种实时的创造性模仿行为，我们将自身的主体位置纳入或脱离其中，并设法超越所谓的超速度进化。
第三部分：流氓的民谣 – 表演：参与者通过个人表演扮演个体在戏剧中的角色，以多样化的语言共同阅读我们的剧本。
嘉宾：宋振＋跨媒体学生黄梁鹏／潘丽娅
时长：共1小时
主题：360°全景节日
摘要：汇报分为3部分：1. 2012年店口项目《社会》／2. 2013社区艺术项目《藏好了吗？》／3. 360°全景节日
本次汇报以宋振不同时期的三个艺术项目，讲述其个人研究与创作的线索。重点介绍2017年开展的《360°全景节日》，讨论如何以节日作为当代艺术的创作资源。
嘉宾：黄梁鹏
主题：After Condensation
摘要：黄梁鹏将介绍其在2016年的合作项目—After Condensation。
这个项目是关于空调水的实验，我们每天遭受到空调水的困扰，它像一颗子弹，在不经意间击中我们，我们做了一个装置来接收空调水以及躲避它，以及我们用不同的方式来使用它。
嘉宾：潘丽娅
主题：眉心轮
摘要：在作品中使用莲蓬，是因为我被它独特的外形与构造深深吸引。莲花蓬表面分布的深色空洞在我面前构成了一副神秘而引人入胜的景象，好像每颗莲子的深处都藏有另一个隐秘的世界。在这幅作品中， 一些孔充满了反映了太阳光丰富多彩的肥皂泡。
嘉宾：Santhosh Sadanandan
时长：30分钟
主题：分配教学法（1）
摘要：我们何以想象艺术生产与实践的过程，或将其概念化？这不一定要有具体的作用但至少要略微触及政治性。从集体或机构的层面而言，是什么构成了这样的（此种）能动性？我的报告会从我主导的两个教学计划中提取一些线索，并试图挑战一些植根于艺术创作领域的问题。或许，本次报告也会指出，在艺术教育中呈现出的被动性会危及艺术的“公共性”，这超出了这一领域的所有支柱。根据朗西埃的观点，分裂或共享的视觉艺术教学也意味着艺术实践，它们在视觉领域同时暴露出我们所共享的内容，在视觉中施行切割，并在可见和不可见之间进行分隔。
Time：morning（10: 00-12: 30）
Guest: Berno Odo Polzer
Duration: 20mins
Title/Theme: Listening Together（1）
Abstract: I’d like to propose a moment of listening together – a shared experiencing of and reflection upon the elusive materiality of thesonic. I am interested in the politics of listening. It would be great if you could bring sounds you like or find important – anything, really, from music to sound forensics. I’ll bring some stuff and would be eager to listen to the yet unknown or the unknowable.
Guest: Prasad Shetty
Duration: 15mins
Title/Theme: Field Notes from Mumbai（1）
Abstract: the presentation will be a reading of a few short stories from my field notes in Mumbai, along with some images. These are stories of different persons – a velvet machine assembler, a small job contractor, atruck owner, a construction labourer, a widow, and an ex-mafia operator. In many ways, these stories nuance and reconfigure the understanding of rights, capital movements, bureaucracy, property, urban form and infrastructure in thecity.
Guest: Rakhee Balaram
Duration: 20mins
Title/Theme: The Insect, The Phantom and the Badaud, or Bystander（1）
Abstract: Rakhee plans to present a talk about each of the three protagonists to consider their role in nature, art, and in the social sciences drawing on science, philosophy and history. Her interest here is in insect mimicry, the figure of the ghost (recurring in our workshop in different guises) and the badaud, or the bystander. These three figures will be considered as positions in which to inhabit the contemporary. All the content above will be divided into three parts for the workshop:
PART ONE:
Lecture/Talk Presentation: a discussion on how to understand these 3 protagonists within the contemporary and in relationship to our own subject positions.
PART TWO:
Inviting participants to generate a play in three acts: participants would be asked to choose one of the three protagonists: the Insect, the Phantom, or the Badaud, or Bystander, generating a dialogue in the form of a play which would be in three acts (possibly in any language). The resulting dialogue will be read in the performance in Part Three as a generative exercise and as a comment upon inhabiting positions of space (actual or virtual) and the way our bodies’ morphologies adapt to it. This would be something that would be produced in real time as a creative act of mimicry as we embody/disembody our subject positions to exceed them-hypertelia.
PART THREE:
The Ballad of the Badaud – a performance: participants would read their play together through the individual acts and in various languages by performing their individual roles in an act of the play.
Guest: Song Zhen & SIMA students（Huang Liangpeng／Léa Pagès）
Duration: 1hour
Title/Theme: 360-degree Panorama of Festivals
Abstract: Song Zhen’s presentation is divided into three parts:
Part 1: Diankou Project ‘Society’, 2012
Part 2: Community Arts Project ‘Have You Hidden Yourself?’, 2013
Part 3: 360-degree Panorama of Festivals
Song Zhen will begin his presentation with three projects took place in different periods, at the same time tell about the clues of his personal research and creative work. He will put an emphasize on the ‘360-degree Panorama of Festivals’ project launched in 2017, discussing how to use ‘festivals’ as the creative resources for contemporary art.
Guest: Huang Liangpeng
Title/Theme: AfterConsideration
Abstract: Huang Liangpeng will introduce a collective project which he participated in 2016.
This project is about an experiment of air conditioning water. We suffer from air conditioning water everyday; it is like a bullet, which accidentally hits us. We made aninstallation to receive the air conditioning water or avoid it, at the same time we made use of it in different methods.
Guest: Léa Pagès
Title/Theme: Wheel of the Eyebrows
Abstract: I was so attracted by the lotus’s unique shape and structure that I used it in this works. The dark holes distributed on the surface of the seed pod of the lotus presents a mysterious and fascinating picture before my eyes, as if each of the lotus seed deep hides another invisible and secret world .In this work, some holes filled with the colorful bubbles, which reflected the colorful sunlight.
Guest: Santhosh Sadanandan
Duration: 30mins
Title/Theme: A Pedagogy of Partage（1）
Abstract: how do we imagine or conceptualise a process of art making or practice of art without being instrumental in character but at least tangentially political? In a collective, or institutional level what constitutes such an initiative? Taking some cues from two pedagogical initiatives that I was an integral part of, my presentation attempts to engage with some of the problematics embedded in the field of artistic production.This presentation may suggest that more than any pillars of the field, the passivity sedimented in art pedagogy will end angerthe ‘commons’ in/of art. Ina Rancierian sense, a visual art pedagogy of partage or sharing envision sartistic practices which simultaneously disclose in the visual fields what we share, operate divisions within the visual, and partition between the visible and invisible.
more